|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 5 post(s) |

Dare Devel
Perkone Caldari State
3
|
Posted - 2011.10.31 20:17:00 -
[1] - Quote
Dear CCP Tallest... The community has echoed their sentiments towards your proposed changes in various ways. Following are mine...
*) Reduce CPU usage: fixed number change is pure wrong. It should have %age reduction - 15% *) Reduce Powergrid Usage: -12% . This is not enough. I think -30% will give the ability to fit a good tank with speed mods and Cap booster. *) Reduced Capacitor usage: All hybrid turrets: -30% capacitor use - Thanks very much this was much needed. *) Tracking Speed Increase: All blaster turrets: +20% to Tracking speed - A 40% buff is really necessary. *) Max Velocity +10 - waste of buff. Really not worth anything *) Inertia Modifier -5% - waste of buff. Really not worth anything *) Tech II Ammo: You said "Javelin is quite obviously underpowered". Then you buff it by removing the cap penalty. Is that why it was underpowered? I am not mentioning the tracking speed penalty removal because it is applied to all ammo types.
The whole community has been providing tons of suggestion for years now. It is very sad to see you come out with this solution. You have completely missed out on... 1) Correcting the base optimal and falloff of blasters. 2) Correcting base damage modifiers on hybrid guns (Rails and Blasters). 3) Correcting the stacking penalty of T2 short range ammo.
If you intend to go forward with your proposed changes please re-imburse me the Skill Points that I have for hybrid guns so that I can pick another (projectile or laser). I will be happy with that.
Many Thanks and Best Regards Dare
|

Dare Devel
Perkone Caldari State
4
|
Posted - 2011.11.02 06:22:00 -
[2] - Quote
Tiger's Spirit wrote:[quote=Lekgoa]Enyo with neutrons + NULL: 212 gun dps @ 4.2+3.9 But dont forget the most important things. If CCP dont fix blasters just using this weak fix, they wont change them again for other 3 years long. We waiting so much time for fix, and we need a real solution for blaster fix or we would be waiting for another 3 years. Keep them under pressure. Give to CCP good and useable ideas or they wont fix fine the hybrid guns with this halfway measures.
I got 3,454,119 Skillpoint in hybrid. If CCP just reimburses it, for me that is the fix. Good riddance.
PS: It is sad to see the hybrid community whining all the time when CCP + other communities refuse to support their plight just because they do not want to see hybrid actively participating in pvp.
|

Dare Devel
Perkone Caldari State
4
|
Posted - 2011.11.03 23:28:00 -
[3] - Quote
Sizeof Void wrote:Speaking of rigs....
In the past, I almost never bother using hybrid weapon rigs, since the PG penalty on top of the high PG req of hybrids is severe - esp. on a gunboat with 5-8 PG hungry blasters or rails.
But, with the reduction in PG for hybrids, it looks like the gun rigs can be used more often now.
A quick EFT test of a T1 Hybrid Collision Accelerator on a old Brutix loadout, with seven T2 heavy neutrons, looks like it will add around 7% to the DPS. The T2 version looks to add around 11%.
Another quick EFT test on an old PVE mission rail loadout showed that the 30% cap reduction of hybrids allowed swapping a CCC rig for a HCA rig, one for one, boosting DPS while still remaining cap stable. Also, the T1 HCA rig is much cheaper than the T1 CCC rig - so, more bang for the buck.
Can your share your fit? |

Dare Devel
Perkone Caldari State
4
|
Posted - 2011.11.04 20:09:00 -
[4] - Quote
New Brawler-Rokh
Hign Slots
8x Neutron Blaster Cannon II (Caldari Navy Antimatar Charge)
Med Slots
1x Stasis Webifier II 2x Large Shield Extender II 2x Invulnerability Field II 1x Quad LiF Fueled Booster Rockets
Low SLots
4xMagnetic Field Stabilizer II 1xDamage Control II
Drone Bay
5x Valkyrie II
Rigs:
Large Hybrid Collision Accelerator I Large Hybrid Ambit Extension I Large Core Defence Field Extender I
AWU 5 Without MWD 24 mins cap Optimal - 7.76 Falloff-17.634 Tracking 0.071 DPS - 926 /CN Animatar optimal 19.4 Falloff - 22 Tracking 0.053 DPS - 738 /NULL
How does it look?
|
|
|
|